mediasmithinc.com Mediasmith Anvil
Volume 4, Issue 4                      May 31, 2005
 
Project Apollo: Ready to go or half baked?

By David L. Smith, CEO; Mediasmith, Inc.  smith@mediasmith.com

There has been much discussion at recent industry events about Project Apollo. This is an initiative of Nielsen/VNU and Arbitron and backed by Procter & Gamble to measure media usage on an “apples to apples” basis. Among the venues that have been reported on across many of the advertising oriented sites are the AAAA Media conference in New Orleans and recent meetings at the ARF.

A major concern that we have is that few seem concerned that the project in its current form does not currently involve the Internet other than streaming audio and video. (Thanks for calling this out to me, Frank.) No banners, no rich media, no search. And, no consideration “for now” of all of the other ways that people are confronted during the day with brand or direct response messaging through the Internet.

Project Apollo’s stated goal is to measure “a day in the life” of a consumer, measuring all media usage utilitizing a single personal meter device.

Mediasmith Morsel. . .
Due to a growing shortage of “prime real estate on the web,” online advertisers have been increasingly turning to behavioral targeting. Behavioral targeting is a database-based online ad targeting system that tracks a consumer's behavior on a Web site to determine his or her interests, then serves ads to that person relevant to that interest. According to a recent survey provided by iMedia and research firm Ponenom Research of online marketers, 64% are currently using behavioral targeting for their client’s online campaigns. Of the respondents that aren’t using behavioral targeting, 58% say that they plan on doing so within the next year. 83% of the agencies that are using behavioral targeting are either satisfied or very satisfied with the results.
http://www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=45148


As we all know, there is a proliferation of media choices and devices. All of these are taking up some of our time. And, all of these involve media exposure, whether there is a commercial message or not. As one example, ever since I got a 300 CD changer, I stopped listening to music radio at home. Sure, I listen to news radio in the bathroom in the morning, but music radio is now relegated to the car. And I get my portable music outside of the car through my MP3 player (Napster/Microsoft compatible, NOT an iPod as I still cannot personally buy into the Apple proprietary format attitude). Real soon now, the dLink media receiver in my living room will push my MP3s through my stereo for everyday use and relegate the original CDs back to individual status. And I really plan to get my MP3 player hooked up in my car too, so radio may be sayonara until I get satellite radio. But, I digress.

In addition to the proliferation stated above, there is more media being consumed away from home, media use increasing personally probably due to non-commercial media like MP3s but also due to multiple media exposures at once. In addition, Channel blurring and expanded product offerings were discussed. (Anybody care to guess how many products either ESPN or MTV have? I will be willing to bet that they both have more than 20. Anybody guess that high?)

The big issue right now: The prototype discussions for this research includes Broadcast TV commercials, cable networks (yes, they still count this as two media), Broadcast Network TV (I guess to measure product placement) Network Radio, in-store media exposure and streaming media. For now, no Web advertising other than streaming. No cinema. No video games. No mobile (cell phones, PDAs, etc.). No out of home. No electronic print. No POP in store. No direct mail and, no mention of how traditional print is being handled.

Now, I am going to go out on a limb here and assume that major factors­ like Web advertising will eventually get included through the efforts of the ARF, AAAA’s, ANA, IAB, OPA, MSN, Yahoo! and others. Although in a meeting at the ARF in April, there was more turf battle than agreement. But, what about search, and what about the next big thing? (Yes editor, I buried the lead). Isn’t this all about staying on top of the big changes that are going on? If the result of this potential landmark research is that we know more about broadcast for TV vs. Cable vs. product placement, great. But what about newer media that are or have reached critical mass?

I will deal with just two of these, search and the PSP. But there are many more, like the iPod and cell phone just to name a few.

For search, nobody seems to care about measuring it from a brand standpoint. Sure, we applaud Dynamic Logic when they release some research showing that search contributes from a branding standpoint, but who is speaking for the brand manager when they ask the reach and frequency implication of these efforts as added to other media? Measuring search from a DR standpoint is simply not enough. We need to know the overall impact of this spending just like we need to know with other media. Why is more detailed search measurement not on the table? Probably because Google and Yahoo “whatever it is” (thanks, Rishad!) have spent the last five years telling us all why they are different than other media and have not tried to sit at the table relative to standards. All the same, any new metrics MUST include search. There is too much money being spent on it to leave it out.

Mediasmith Morsel. . .
According to a recent survey conducted by AOL, CNET reports that, on average, people check their e-mail about five times a day, and a quarter of them cannot go without it for more than three days at a stretch. As many as 77 percent of respondents to the survey said they have more than one e-mail account. For 41 percent, morning coffee can wait, but not e-mail; accessing e-mail is the first thing they do in the morning. For six out of 10 users even vacation is not the time to take a break from e-mail. Almost all of the respondents felt that it is very or somewhat important to have access to e-mail. And, about half of the respondents, or 47 percent, said they check their personal e-mail at work, albeit sporadically.

My second example (and I am sure you have many more) is the Sony PSP which just came out. This is a huge threat to the iPod as the hot new CE item. It does so much more than bury Nintendo in the portable video game market. It will run movies, play MP3s, show photos and whatever else you can imagine over time that you want to take with you. It will not replace MP3 players as they will be affordably dedicated to massive amounts of music portably. But it could spell the death knell for iPod which has been as much about fashion as music. There are many more efficient ways to listen to music using the Microsoft and Napster (and their competitors’) solutions.

But, if I am right, and the PSP is something that several million people will be carrying around by Christmas, how can we not measure that?

So I have two questions to wrap this up…

Are the people doing Project Apollo just trying to protect their jobs and those around them by adding better metrics to TV and radio?

And secondly, what are you doing with your representative to the trade associations to which you belong to lobby for inclusion of “traditional interactive” and new media into the project?

Mediasmith Morsel. . .

According to eMarketer, reporting on WebTrends data, third party cookie rejection rates worldwide have increased from just under three percent in January of 2004 to over 12% in April of this year. The rejection rate indicates a visitor blocking cookies from ever being set on their machines, as opposed to deletion.

David L. Smith is the CEO of Mediasmith, Inc., the Integrated Solutions Media Agency based in San Francisco. He can be reached at smith@mediasmith.com.

Note: A version of this article ran in iMediaConnection in April of this year.

Contact Mediasmith, Inc.

You are receiving this newsletter from Mediasmith as part of our efforts to keep our friends abreast of what's going on in the interactive advertising arena.

If you'd rather not receive this or any other Mediasmith publication in the future, you can unsubscribe by e-mailing us at newsletter@mediasmith.com with the word Unsubscribe in the subject.

If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - 
http://www.mediasmith.com/contacts/subscribe.html to sign up for these newsletters.

 

Directions to Mediasmith   mediasmithinc.biz
274 Brannan St, Ste 601
San Francisco, CA 94107
(415) 252-9339
(415) 252-9854 fax


Home
| About Us | Clients | White Papers | Contacts