![]() |
Mediasmith Anvil |
| Volume 2, Issue 10 October 1, 2002 | |
| What the Next Generation Will Expect |
|
By David L. Smith, President/Media Director; Mediasmith, Inc. smith@mediasmithinc.com We can only speculate about the future. But given the lessons of the past, products and services will increasingly be tailored to consumer demand. It is one thing to invent something. It is another to put something into the marketplace that people really want. I have worked with a number of technology and new product companies over the last 35 years. I've seen colossal failures and successes. Too many of the failures were driven by engineering or product development, then shipped to marketing to sell, "because it was cool". I have seen many more successes when engineering took the lead of marketing and really wanted to know what the consumer wanted. A few years ago, at the startup of the Web, it was common to say, "The Web will change everything." Now that the bloom is off, the nay sayers (as they did then, but do now with more glee) are saying that it wasn't such a success after all. Let's not confuse commercial success with consumer adoption. Consumer adoption continues to grow, albeit at a slower rate, as all technologies do as they approach market penetration. Market potential in this case is represented by homes/people with computers in their home or office, not the whole population (at least until more affordable devices emerge). If my twelve year old, Dale, and his friends are any example, the Web has already changed the next generation. They expect so much more from products, especially media technology products today and this expectation will only grow as they do. Because, if my generation was the TV generation, his generation will definitely be the Multi Media Interactive Generation (MMIG). My MMIG son burned a CD before lunch today from tunes that he had either
downloaded off the Web or ripped from a CD we had bought him. Purpose?
Put together a set for the afternoon while his friend came over. He
then proceeded to wire his portable CD player through his PC to play
the CD back. |
|
Mediasmith Morsel. . . |
|
As we were discussing this, Dale asked why they didn't have a better display, a display on the remote, the ability to filter, re-sort, search, etc. Now it never occurred to me that my 12 year old would understand Boolean search parameters so early on, but it turns out they are second nature to him. The difference between sorting, searching and filtering is something we all had to learn when we got our first desktop database to play with. His generation will demand that such characteristics be built into all media technology products. Not just Web and not just search engines on the Web. Another example: A few months earlier, our StarSight box had gone down.
StarSight
is the base technology behind the TV
Guide/Gemstar onscreen guide business. StarSight invented
the category and had the original patents on things like "changing
channels from an on-screen prompt" and "recording from an
on-screen prompt" that have become the intellectual property behind
Gemstar through acquisition a few years ago. But back in the early 90's,
StarSight was a standalone company that Mediasmith worked with as their
outsourced marketing group. As such, we have always had an on-screen
electronic television guide, made available through a standalone unit
and a subscription. Even today, it does much more than the digital cable
guides, giving us control over VCR functions, genre selections, and
a grid guide like the one that we see in the paper and TV guide as well
as many more functions. When the box went down (required a "reboot"
and waiting until after midnight to get the next automatic data dump
to repopulate the fields), Dale said that he could not tell what time
his programs were on. Then came the revelation. I showed him that the
listings were in the newspaper. "How often?" he asked. "Every
day" I responded. "No" he said incredulously. "Why
would they do that when you can get it on screen." I patiently
explained to him that not all people had this feature. But for him,
it was not only an assumption, it was required. |
|
Mediasmith Morsel. . . |
|
It will be interesting to see how the future of new technology products
plays out. We can all give examples of nifty product ideas that did
not fly with consumers, as they did not fill a basic demand. Study of
the consumer and what they expect should be a basic rule in creation
of new media technologies. But it won't always be that way. However,
the smart engineers and inventors will work in conjunction with marketers
and market researchers to determine demand. They will be the ones who
will succeed. |
| Mediasmith
Morsel. . . DoubleClick recently released a media mix study that was conducted on behalf of a prescription allergy drug brand. According to the study, online advertising was the most cost-effective advertising medium at driving incremental sales. For the test, print advertising was almost twice as effective as TV in driving incremental sales for this allergy drug, while online advertising was more than three times more effective than TV at driving incremental sales (relative to dollars spent). |
|
David L. Smith is President of Mediasmith, Inc., the Integrated Solutions Media Agency based in San Francisco. He can be reached at smith@mediasmithinc.com. Note: A version of this article first appeared in MediaPost's Online Spin in August, 2002. |
| Contact Mediasmith, Inc. |
|
Mediasmith sends this newsletter as part
of our efforts to keep our friends abreast of what's going on in the
interactive advertising arena. |
![]() |
||||
| 555
De Haro Street, Suite 360 San Francisco, CA 94107 (415) 252-9339 (415) 252-9854 fax |
||||
|
|