mediasmith.com

Mediasmith Anvil

Volume 5, Issue 5                      September 21, 2006

 

 

What Engagement REALLY Is (Or, Engagement for Dummies)

By David Smith

The founder and CEO of Mediasmith provides a layman's definition of engagement and explains how the web can best measure it.

In a recent article for iMedia which also became July’s Anvil, I talked about the technical definition of engagement, saying that it was more of an effectiveness than an exposure metric. In this article, I want to talk about engagement from a logical laymen's perspective. I feel a need to write this as more and more conferences are being scheduled about engagement, and more media are claiming that they have a superior claim relative to engagement. Simmons is even developing an engagement metric.

 

As I have said before, engagement, while related to the medium that carries the message, is primarily a product- or service-oriented attribute. Let me give an example: Opting in is a sign that you are engaged. You have made the decision to get involved with messaging from a brand by agreeing to have it sent to you on a regular basis.

 

The  National Geographic Channel/Mediasmith Morsel
MediaPost recently cited a PQ Media study that found that there was a 42% worldwide growth in paid product placement spending in 2005.  In 2006, this category is expected to grow another 39%.  The US is leading the pack with paid product placements.  In 2005, the US spent $1.5 billion in this arena, which is up 49% from the prior year.

 Global Paid Product Placement Spending: 2000 to 2005 ($US Millions)

 

Television

Film

Other Media*

Total

Year

Spend

Growth

Spend

Growth

Spend

Growth

Spend

Growth

2005

$1,429.3

56.8%

$ 721.8

20.5

$58.1

32.3%

$2,209.2

42.2%

2006

2,113.1

47.8

876.1

21.4

77.7

33.7

3,066.9

38.8

2010

5,561.6

--

1,768.5

--

221.3

--

7,551.4

--

Sources: PQ Media, iTVX

*Other media, including magazines, newspapers, videogames, Internet, music, books, and radio

 

In my mind, engagement is clearly on the shoulders of the brand and those who convey the message. But it is not totally in the control of the messaging (advertising) folks. Two examples: while a commercial, print ad, internet message or some other form might convince me to try a new toothpaste or soap (yep, probably a TV spot, as they still work best for a lot of new things), I probably do not become fully engaged with it until I try it in the shower, smell it and feel it. Yet I became engaged with the Maserati Gran Turismo Coupe the first time I saw it at an auto show. Engagement is an unconscious tick of the mind that causes you to think differently about and notice a brand differently in the future. And advertising can help big time in this process. You don't even have to be able to afford it.

 

The web has a clear lead in engagement. After all, did you ever even hear the term opt-in before the web came along-- even though we had been opting in to catalogues, consciously or unconsciously for years? And there have been TV spots loved and hated. But the web, with its lean-forward aspect, gets you involved. And puts choices in front of you that cause you to make conscious decisions about further involvement with something. And whatever that is, you can perform an efficiency ranking on it. Registrations, downloads, visits to a site, purchases, requests for more information-- you name it. That's why I don't recommend using the CPA term in computing efficiency. CPA is now forever branded in the metric associated with an online ad sales methodology. I suggest (with a smile J) that you use CPW (or cost-per-whatever you are trying to measure). Once you do this, you end up having discussions about engagement metrics.

 

Mediasmith Morsel
We want to give you $1,500..
In FREE services anyway. Bob Heyman, our Chief Search Officer, wants to analyze your website’s Search ranking. See how your site stacks up against your competitors’. Find specific areas for improvement. You could be missing out on sales/leads/branding opportunities and not even know it! Call or email Bob Heyman now to take us up on this valuable offer. Bob can be reached at 415-321-8881 or bheyman@mediasmith.com.  Offer good through 10/16/2006.

 

With other media, we evaluate them all based on their CPM (cost-per-thousand impressions). With the web (and other media as they become digital and trackable), the subject changes to CPW, not CPM. And we end up having two discussions. First, what is the "W" that we are going to measure? Then, what kind of CPW can we achieve, and does that meet the goal to successfully sell the product or service at a profit? We're over 10 years into the web advertising revolution, yet none of the other media that we use can measure up to the metrics of the web.

 

If you want engagement, other media can claim it, but only the web can prove what the cost per engaged user is, whatever your metric.

 

Mediasmith Morsel
Digital Out-of-Home Growing at Speed of Light
Since 2002, 700 new digital out-of-home networks have launched.  This category includes everything from TVs in retail stores and on gas pumps to inside public restrooms.  According to MediaPost, this year $1.2 billion will be spent on these media, making it the equivalent to a major network TV daypart.

 

A version of this article originally appeared in iMedia.

David L. Smith is CEO and founder of Mediasmith, Inc., a San Francisco-based media agency. Read bio here.

 

 

Contact Mediasmith, Inc.

You are receiving this newsletter from Mediasmith as part of our efforts to keep our friends abreast of what's going on in the interactive advertising arena.

If this issue was forwarded to you and you would like to begin receiving a copy of your own, please visit our site - http://www.mediasmith.com/contacts/subscribe.html to sign up for these newsletters.

 

Directions to Mediasmith

 

mediasmithinc.biz

274 Brannan St, Ste 601
San Francisco, CA 94107

(415) 252-9339
(415) 252-9854 fax