Monday December 30
Jun 2002 Issue |
A
Kinder, Humbler AOL? Is the Online Giant Turning
Itself Around With Advertisers? When it comes to media
coverage of the Internet lately, nothing succeeds like
fa |
StartupCloseup:
Tennis Channel, Anyone? New channel looks for love
in the cable universe. If marquee names were all it took
to fill the seats — or acquire enough distribution —
The |
InternetUniversity:
Are You Ready for DHTML? The dust is finally
dispersing from the Internet advertising implosion, and
advertisers are noticeably less skeptical about trying new
things online. |
Dispatches
from MediaPost: Has Convergence Gone Too Far? Once
everyone’s favorite buzzword, convergence is no longer the
stuff of dreams. The Internet has blurred many lines between
different media, and tha |
Future
Tool: AirClic Do you remember the :CueCat? Courtesy of
Digimarc’s MediaBridge and Digital Convergence, it was all the
rage in 2000–2001. Hundreds of thousand of the |
Research
Behind the Numbers: Branding A report claims most
web advertising is intended to advertise brand. A
recent bulletin at the AdRelevance website proclaims that a
“majo |
How
to Read CLICK-
|
On
Second Thought: The New Ts & Cs For Online Ads The
early years of online advertising were an exciting time, and
as we (a buyer and a seller) think back to that era, it sure
seemed as if it was easy |
Hot
Fun In The Summertime Everyone knows that Web traffic
and advertising slow down in the summer, but there are sites
that succeed while the others are sweating it out. Dat
|
The
End of Rich Media Is rich media still the savior of
interactive marketing, or just more hype to be piled onto the
bonfire of the dot-com meltdown? In March and
|
Agency
Profile: Zentropy Partners Using a customer-centric
approach, Zentropy Partners helps clients find their direction
online. The year was 1995. Two guys in California,
fr |
Internet
Advertising 101: Effective Performance-Based Marketing
Identifying Cost Per Action (CPA) campaigns that have a
reasonable likelihood of success is an art form. It takes
(Internet) years of experience. But |
Shop
Talk: Good Things in Small Packages Maybe small is
beautiful. I’ve been thinking about that lately, as I research
the small creative shops that serve the interactive business.
My 20-year |
Media
for the Online World: No Denying - Web’s for Branding
If you’ve been part of this industry for a significant
period of time, you no doubt recognize (and groan at) the
ongoing circular debate about whether |
Media
Circus: Softening The Target Standing in line at a
Ralph’s grocery store here in So-Cal not too long ago, I
refused to absorb ad impressions and other information from a
small TV |
FutureTool:
Not on a Tear: Electronic Tear Sheets For as long as
there have been newspapers, tear sheets have been used to
confirm to advertisers that their ads have run. It’s a
laborious and costly |
PIBFocus:
Winners, Sinners in the Magazine Game This month at
MEDIA, we chose to take a panoramic view of the winners and
losers in the magazine industry, according to 2001 figures
from the Publishe |
HowTo
. . . Mall Tours They aren’t just for boy bands
anymore. Using a mall tour to get big brand to their
audience is no big secret. Well, maybe it is. Teen-cent
|
StartupCloseup:
Tennis Channel, Anyone? New channel looks for love
in the cable universe. If marquee names were all it took
to fill the seats — or acquire enough distribution — The
T |
Magazines
Deal With the Big Squeeze Times Get Even
Tougher In the world of consumer print publishing, there
are challenges you like to face. Increasing circulation.
Improving con |
What
Media Planners Really Think About Magazines: The Media
Debate We’ve all read the headlines about the sorry
state of the magazine industry, but what do people who
evaluate magazines for their clients really think
|
Agency
Profile: Tapestry Starcom’s multicultural division
stirs the melting pot. Usually an agency likes to give
clients what they want and tell them what they want t
|
Research
Behind the Numbers: Media Consumption Magazine
Readers Don’t Pine for Online. People may be spending lots
of time on the Internet, but they’re not interested in
online’s attempts |
Media
for a New World: Extreme Sport, Mainstream Marketing
So this is what it has come to: The networks, broadcast
and cable, are green with envy over MTV’s The Osbournes, which
by drawing in the neighborhood |
Media
for a New World: The New Media Agency In March, I
wrote an article for MediaPost’s MediaDailyNews (see
MediaDailyNews Archives at www.mediapost.com for 3/4/02)
titled "A New Planning Organ |
Shop
Talk: Good Things in Small Packages Maybe small is
beautiful. I’ve been thinking about that lately, as I research
the small creative shops that serve the interactive business.
My 20-year |
Media
Soapbox: Working Mother: The Next Generation There is
nothing more heart-pounding than launching a new national
magazine, except relaunching a magazine you love in a very
difficult marketplace. I |
Media
Circus: Softening The Target Standing in line at a
Ralph’s grocery store here in So-Cal not too long ago, I
refused to absorb ad impressions and other information from a
small TV |
ClickPicks:
Ads.com If you’re one of those people who actually pay
attention to TV commercials and often find yourself pondering
questions such as "I wonder what agency p |
AdServer
Focus: AdManager 6.0 When CMGI didn’t renew a $50
million loan to Engage last year, the online ad world thought
the latter company — once the world’s second biggest ad
net |
Archive
 | |

Media for a New World: The New Media
Agency By David L. Smith June 2002 Issue
In March, I wrote an article for MediaPost’s MediaDailyNews (see
MediaDailyNews Archives at www.mediapost.com for 3/4/02) titled "A
New Planning Organization." In it I discussed the concept of the new
independent media (planning) agencies taking over the account
planning function. In this article I will expand on the concept and
talk about "The New Media Agency" from a global standpoint.
A little history is in order here. Media planning and buying
always used to coexist within the same organization as creative.
Yes, kids, it’s true. They were called full-service agencies. In the
late ’60s and through the late ’80s, buying — starting with spot TV
and eventually involving all broadcast — moved into independent
media buying companies. In the early ’90s, these companies started
to become "full-service media agencies," adding media planning to
the service mix.
At that point the major agencies and holding companies had all
begun experimenting with spinning off their buying units into
separate organizations. Some of these operations (e.g., Omnicom
Group’s OMD) were involved in broadcast buying only, and some
maintained the structure of the media departments from which they
were spun off, encompassing buying and planning (e.g., Bcom3 Group’s
Starcom). A number of forces converged to cause this, including the
increasing incursion of independent buyers such as Aegis Group’s
Carat and Interpublic Group’s Initiative Media; the continued move
on the client side to "agency-of-record" assignments, wherein one
buyer executed all efforts within a medium (even where there were a
number of different major creative agencies); and the growing
importance of media in the eyes of the client.
In the past few years, the media planning function has moved
toward the independents, a development that really marks the
coming-of-age of the independent media operation. For the longest
time the creative agencies held on to media planning with the
argument that media planning needed to be partnered with the
creative group for true strategic innovation to happen. We all know
now that this is not necessary, and that in fact such bundling might
hold media planning back.
Since the largest percentage of the advertising agency budget
goes into media (85% for traditional and 70% for interactive), it
stands to reason that the new media agency should become the "agency
of record" for all media. Media relationships have proven to be
longer than creative relationships. It used to be that agencies
rotated creative groups on and off a business in order to keep the
thinking fresh. They did so at the behest of the client, who needed
to stay with the agency because of the need for media operation
continuity. In today’s media world, the client is free to use a
number of different creative resources as necessary, with the
independent media operation providing the continuity. So if what we
used to know as the major agencies become creative shops, what is
the natural form of the new media agency that will best serve the
client? After discussions with others in the industry, I’ve come up
with one potential formation, which includes the functions featured
in the following chart. This model calls for the new media agency to
embrace a wide range of expertise, ranging from account planning and
business analytics to sales promotion and interactive planning and
buying. In addition to the functions in the table, the new media
agency should develop expertise in direct response alongside
branding. We always learn something new from a new medium, and the
Web has been no exception. It is clear that there is a lot of
learning relative to pricing and results that can be derived from
direct response media efforts. Yet few media agencies have the core
competency to deal with both on a major scale.
Strategic thinking would come from a team of senior analytical
types, typically from media planning, business analytics, and
account planning. Account management may or may not have a role on
this team, depending upon the agency structure and background of
account management. Or it may be limited to a coordination role.
Where will tomorrow’s managers come from in this new media
agency? To date among the media independents, they have come from
the ranks of media planners, business management, and account
management. But leaders stand out, and it is conceivable that top
management for such an organization could rise out of any of the
specialties.
It makes great sense to bring market research, account planning,
and business analytics under one roof, working alongside the media
planner. In this way, all of the necessary related functions will be
communicating with and drawing from each other. As it is today,
there is too much non-communication within client and agency
organizations among market research, account planning, and media
planning, except after the fact. This turf battle could end in the
new organization and only benefit the client.
The planner will need to be truly in charge of planning of all
media, separating out planning from buying in the interactive space.
Too much strategic decision-making in interactive is done at the
execution stage rather than from a true planning perspective. It
made a big difference at Mediasmith when we split off the two
functions and planning did not start with sending out an RFP, but
with objectives, analysis, and consideration of alternative
strategies that work with the traditional media plan to maximize the
client’s budget. If you talk to clients, they are getting tired of
feeding several agencies and keeping interactive separate. They want
us as experts to tell them what the media mix should be.
I have no doubt that a number of the majors are either pondering
or experimenting with some or all of the above. As it plays out,
career growth potential for the media planner will reach a peak and
an influx of the best graduates into our profession will certainly
ensue.
David L. Smith is president of Mediasmith, Inc., the integrated
solutions media agency based in San Francisco. He can be reached at
smith@mediasmithinc.com
|
With
MediaPost's Media
People Finder you can quickly locate any of our
35,000 MediaPost members.
| |
|