Two short years ago
(seems like light years) I wrote an article for MediaDailyNews regarding
marketing logistics and how we get our business and marketing
terminology from warfare. The nightly news has definitely brought this
back to mind. As I was watching on Wednesday night, seeing the convoy of
gas trucks charging and sometimes fighting their way to the front lines
to enable the tanks to continue their move on Baghdad, I was reminded of
the Battle of the Bulge, where the allies beat a superior German tank
force because the Germans ran out of fuel. Today's Spin brings that
article forward to 2003 with some comments revisited and some updated.
Up until the early 1980's, strategy and tactics defined wars. World
War II was largely a strategic war, for both sides. Vietnam was a war
fought for strategic purposes that ended up being tactical. The
Falkland's War was different. It was the first war ever fought that was
based on logistics. There was certainly no strategic reason for
Britain's insisted ownership of these "rocks". While the Brits are proud
of fighting this battle "alone", they required American satellite
intelligence and U.S. naval logistical support for supplies in order to
defeat the Argentinean invasion (or from the Argentinean perspective,
repatriation).
The first Gulf War was also fought from a logistical standpoint. The
Desert Storm Coalition (headed by the U.S.) did not go across the "line
in the sand" until everything was in place. Planes, fuel, ammunition,
tanks and men brought by ship and plane. Ships gathered in the Persian
Gulf. We crossed the line when we were fully supplied and ready. I don't
know that there has been another war in history whose start was so
calculated. Now as Yogi Berra said, it is déjà vu all over again. We
started the second Gulf War on a schedule, based on when we had our
pieces in place.
Marketing Logistics
In marketing, we talk about strategy and tactics. Both terms from
warfare. The lessons of Sun Tzu about warfare can easily be translated
into marketing and business lessons.
We would argue that now is the time to make a serious study of your
marketing logistics and what you have to do to improve on them or what
new ones you must adopt to "win the war".
This may or may not be obvious, so I'll give some examples. Most
center on data, but there are other issues too.
Sales
In the videogame category, success used to be judged based on the
initial sell in and eventual reorder(s). These days, the videogame
industry has become more and more like the movies. It is all about hits
and the first weekend is everything. Rather than order all or much of
their inventory up front, most retail operations order enough to stock
the shelves. It then becomes the goal of a software publisher to create
an out of stock situation on the first weekend so that there are
reorders the next Monday. No reorders, little or no additional volume.
This is a fine line as the publisher wants a reorder situation but does
not want to miss too many sales in the first weekend. And the retailer
does not want to load up with too much inventory.
In fact, inventory for many retail categories is becoming more and
more "just in time". If you want to learn more about this and do not
sell through retail, check out what is happening with the major
retailers like Wal-Mart these days and how they have changed their
inventory management through business intelligence and in some cases
business process management relative to "just in time" inventory
control.
Another sales example: most categories of products outside of
consumer package goods have inadequate sales information. For example,
computer software, hardware and peripheral companies, consumer
electronic companies and many other upscale categories sell to
distributors who sell to stores, in the simplest scenario. Good real
time tracking systems do not exist for most of these companies. And
unlike consumer package goods, there is no Nielsen or IRI like service
to track sales. Without good sales data, (time/date of sale, location of
sale), it is incredibly hard to attribute or predict sales activity as a
result of marketing expense. The result is that huge companies are
flying blind with their budgeting process.
Importantly, the package goods folks are not stopping with the best
tracking in business. Procter and Gamble is testing the embedding of
chips into toothpaste and other packages. They will know when it goes
off the shelf, into a basket, if you put it back on the shelf, and for
sure, when it is rung up and where. While we recognize that this is in
early stages, if it turns out that they can afford to do this with good
reliable data resulting, the value of application of this technology to
other categories could be beyond calculation. So, where are the
technology companies in this, getting led by a soap factory? They have
little data on when and where software packages actually move off the
shelf and yet they don't have an apparent industry initiative to fix
this situation.
Intelligence
Specific to the world of advertising, we could use better competitive
media spending intelligence. The online category has a low degree of
accuracy (oftentimes +- 50% for a campaign and +- hundreds of percentage
points for an individual site within a campaign). But the data is
available quickly. From some sources, within a week. The offline
spending metrics are often as close as 10-30%, but it takes months
before we get the data. We need better data faster. We also need easier
ways to track creative executions and strategy changes. Wonder how far
this AI stuff really is from execution?
There are other examples in the world of resources and tracking
advertising effectiveness. I'm sure that some of you have other examples
of marketing systems that could be made better through logistics
improvements. This remains an area of great leverage. We'd like to hear
your input.
David L. Smith is CEO of Mediasmith, Inc.